The C.A.M. Report
Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Fair, Balanced, and to the Point
  • About this web log

    This blog is intended as an objective and dispassionate source of information on the latest CAM research. Since my background is in pharmacy and allopathic medicine, I view all CAM as advancing through the development pipeline to eventually become integrated into mainstream medical practice. Some will succeed while others fail. But all are treated fairly here.

  • About the author

    John Russo, Jr., PharmD, is president of The MedCom Resource, Inc. Previously, he was senior vice president of medical communications at www.Vicus.com, a complementary and alternative medicine website.

  • Common sense considerations

    The material on this weblog is for informational purposes. It is not medical advice or counsel. Be smart, consult your health professional before using CAM.

  • Support this site

    If you found the information here helpful, please consider supporting this site.If you found the information here helpful, please consider supporting this site.

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    Review of acupuncture to treat alcohol dependence

    Acupuncture has been used in the treatment of substance-related disorders for the past 30 years.

    Researchers at Kyung Hee University Medical Center, in Seoul, Korea, reviewed the evidence.

    First, the details.

    • 11 studies in 1,110 people were systematically reviewed.
    • Only 2 of 11 studies were of high quality.

    And, the results.

    • 4 studies of acupuncture vs sham treatments reported data for alcohol craving.
      • 3 studies reported no significant differences.
    • 4 trials compared acupuncture and no acupuncture to conventional therapies
      • 3 reported significant reductions.
    • No differences between acupuncture and sham treatments were found for completion rates.
      • There were also no differences between acupuncture and no acupuncture.
    • Only 3 studies reported acupuncture-related side effects, which were mostly minimal.

    The bottom line?

    The authors concluded, “The results of the included studies were equivocal.”

    After 30 years we should expect more.

    4/13/10 21:06 JR

    Leave a Comment

    You must be logged in to post a comment.