The C.A.M. Report
Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Fair, Balanced, and to the Point
  • About this web log

    This blog is intended as an objective and dispassionate source of information on the latest CAM research. Since my background is in pharmacy and allopathic medicine, I view all CAM as advancing through the development pipeline to eventually become integrated into mainstream medical practice. Some will succeed while others fail. But all are treated fairly here.

  • About the author

    John Russo, Jr., PharmD, is president of The MedCom Resource, Inc. Previously, he was senior vice president of medical communications at www.Vicus.com, a complementary and alternative medicine website.

  • Common sense considerations

    The material on this weblog is for informational purposes. It is not medical advice or counsel. Be smart, consult your health professional before using CAM.

  • Support this site

    If you found the information here helpful, please consider supporting this site.If you found the information here helpful, please consider supporting this site.

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    Acupuncture in patients with irritable bowel syndrome

    Researchers from The Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, in Boston compared true and sham acupuncture in relieving symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome.

    First, the details.

    • 230 adults with irritable bowel syndrome were randomly assigned to treatment group for 3 weeks.
      • True acupuncture (6 treatments)
      • Sham acupuncture (6 treatments)
      • A wait list control group
    • This treatment followed 3-weeks of sham acupuncture in an “augmented” or “limited” patient-practitioner interaction.
    • The IBS Global Improvement Scale, IBS Symptom Severity Scale, IBS Adequate Relief, and the IBS Quality of Life scales were used to assess outcomes.

    And, the results.

    • There was no statistically significant difference between acupuncture and sham acupuncture on the IBS Global Improvement Scale.
    • Both groups improved significantly vs the wait list control group.
    • There were no differences in the other evaluations.
    • Side effects were generally mild and only slightly greater in the acupuncture group.

    The bottom line?
    The authors concluded, “This study did not find evidence to support the superiority of acupuncture compared with sham acupuncture in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome.”

    A recent review of CAM for irritable bowel syndrome came to the same conclusion — no evidence to support its use.

    Similarly, another review  found no difference between real and sham acupuncture.

    Researchers from the Karolinska Institutet, in Stockholm, Sweden suggest it’s inappropriate to conduct studies that compare real vs sham acupuncture. Rather, the response to acupuncture should be compared with the standard treatment, taking into consideration patient factors that might affect the outcome.

    6/25/09 19:10 JR

    Leave a Comment

    You must be logged in to post a comment.