The C.A.M. Report
Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Fair, Balanced, and to the Point
  • About this web log

    This blog is intended as an objective and dispassionate source of information on the latest CAM research. Since my background is in pharmacy and allopathic medicine, I view all CAM as advancing through the development pipeline to eventually become integrated into mainstream medical practice. Some will succeed while others fail. But all are treated fairly here.

  • About the author

    John Russo, Jr., PharmD, is president of The MedCom Resource, Inc. Previously, he was senior vice president of medical communications at www.Vicus.com, a complementary and alternative medicine website.

  • Common sense considerations

    The material on this weblog is for informational purposes. It is not medical advice or counsel. Be smart, consult your health professional before using CAM.

  • Support this site

    If you found the information here helpful, please consider supporting this site.If you found the information here helpful, please consider supporting this site.

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    Biggest loser in CAM for 2008

    Airborne.

    Unfortunately, the biggest losers are the people who were coned into taking a “health product” with insufficient supporting scientific evidence.

    Airborne’s problems started in 2006 when ABC News revealed that Airborne’s only study in support of its advertising was conducted without any doctors or scientists — just a “two-man operation started up just to do the Airborne study.”

    In August 2008, The Washington Post reported, “Over the past decade, millions of consumers, including Oprah, have come to swear by Airborne — fizzy orange tablets containing vitamins, herbs, and minerals that its makers for years said keeps cold germs at bay.”

    However, following a class action suit against Airborne Health (Bonita Springs, Florida) the court ruled, “There is no credible evidence that Airborne products . . . will reduce the severity or duration of colds, or provide any tangible benefit for people who are exposed to germs in crowded places.”

    Accordingly, the manufacturer had to change its packaging and marketing language.

    The bottom line?

    First impressions are the most difficult to erase. And Airborne continues to be sold to unsuspecting consumers.

    For the record, Airborne is not…

    • “A miracle cold buster”
    • A “natural cold remedy”
    • And, there’s is no proof that taking it “at the first sign of a cold symptom or before entering crowded, potentially germ-infested places” lowers the risk of getting sick.

    A summary of the lack of evidence is available here. It’s important to remember that Airborne contains, among other things, echinacea. There’s some evidence supporting echinacea, but not when used in combination with other ingredients in the Airborne formulation.
    12/29/08 19:50 JR

    Leave a Comment

    XHTML: Line-breaks are automatic. Available tags are <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>