The C.A.M. Report
Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Fair, Balanced, and to the Point
  • About this web log

    This blog is intended as an objective and dispassionate source of information on the latest CAM research. Since my background is in pharmacy and allopathic medicine, I view all CAM as advancing through the development pipeline to eventually become integrated into mainstream medical practice. Some will succeed while others fail. But all are treated fairly here.

  • About the author

    John Russo, Jr., PharmD, is president of The MedCom Resource, Inc. Previously, he was senior vice president of medical communications at www.Vicus.com, a complementary and alternative medicine website.

  • Common sense considerations

    The material on this weblog is for informational purposes. It is not medical advice or counsel. Be smart, consult your health professional before using CAM.

  • Support this site

    If you found the information here helpful, please consider supporting this site.If you found the information here helpful, please consider supporting this site.

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    Reconsidering the effect of folate on breast cancer risk

    A published (and widely circulated in the lay press) study by researchers at Lund University in Sweden reported that high folate intake by women 50 years and older was associated with a lower incidence of postmenopausal breast cancer.

    Of greater interest is an editorial by Dr. Cornelia Ulrich from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, Washington.

    Dr. Ulrich observes that these findings are not supported by previous, largely US-based studies. One possible explanation is that the Swedish study population, of which only 19% were supplement users, had lower intakes of folate than did the US populations studied previously. If only a very low folate status increases the risk of invasive breast cancer, then strong associations can be detected only in populations that include a sufficient number of women in the low-folate range.

    The good doctor continues, “This finding raises the question of whether intakes that exceed an ‘adequate’ level are still protective against breast cancer risk.” Based on what is known, “There is little evidence of an additional reduction in risk at above-adequate folate intakes.”

    The bottom line?
    We should be cautious about accepting that any widespread increase in folate intake will protect from breast cancer and, therefore, should be part of public health measures.

    “Folate may play a dual role in cancer development,” she speculates.

    • It may provide protection early in cancer development and in individuals who don’t take in enough folate.
    • Alternatively, it may promote cancer if administered later and potentially at very high intakes.

    Dr. Ulrich concludes, “We need to evaluate this information carefully when developing public health recommendations and should be mindful that more folate is not better in all circumstances.”

    8/26/07 14:22 JR

    Leave a Comment

    XHTML: Line-breaks are automatic. Available tags are <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>